![]() Samples can get the notes okay enough but it can't get what actually makes this a "performance" and not a rendition. Seriously try and mock up even the first "A" section of Death and the Maiden. But it's great for people like us because you can immediately judge a sample library by how close it comes provided the mockup artist did a good job. So the whole idea of doing mockups of well known pieces that have been performed over and over again with real people is really foolhearted imo. It is easier to fool people if they don't immediately have to hand a recording of live people playing the music. So focusing on the expression is the important part with samples. I just realized after a while that you just have to make the samples as musical as possible and fool people into either thinking that it's real or not caring. Personally it was hard to make the transition for me from real instruments to samples. Sample modeling comes closer but you then sacrifice a lot of sound quality. Comparing the mockup to the real thing will give you first hand experience of the wealth of on the spot expression and articulations that aren't possible with samples or even sample modeling. It isn't attempted more because it's hard and the results aren't convincing. Even in the CSS Vivaldi it easy to tell they are samples. The answer is in the question being asked. Click to expand.You're asking the question why is a virtuoso violinist better than samples. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |